SSA Sponsors KBS 2017

First published: 03 July 2017 | Last updated: 27 March 2019

The Kettil Bruun Society for Social and Epidemiological Research on Alcohol (a real mouthful – so for short, it’s usually called KBS) met for the 43rd time in Sheffield from 5-9 June 2017. A fair bit of effort, creativity and fun had gone into trying to make this conference a great experience for everyone. The hard work paid off, and around 250 delegates from every part of the world flocked to Sheffield.

The conference

KBS is somewhat unusual in that the papers have to be on work in progress rather than polished end products, and are delivered by junior and senior presenters on a level playing field. There are no invited key note speeches and the like – everyone gets 10 minutes, and that’s that. Each 90-minute session contains three or four papers, and every two papers are followed by 10 minutes of live peer review (when discussants, who see the papers in advance of the conference, put in a lot of work to help authors improve their papers or provide ideas of new avenues for their research ideas) and audience questions. I suspect this must have saved me any number of rejections by journals over the years, and hearing literally hundreds of people share their comments with the audience gives you a very good idea of how the usually hidden process works.

The following is a list of session topics at this year’s conference, loosely grouped by thematic content:

 

Major topic area: Alcohol consumption, drinking patterns & trends

Epidemiology and youth drinking

Trends in adult drinking

Lifetime drinking trajectories

Temporary abstinence and indulgence

Behaviour change & Drinking occasions

Alcohol measurement

University students’ drinking

The concept of addiction

Predictors of youth drinking in Africa

 

 

 

Major topic area: Alcohol-related harm

Alcohol and inequalities

New methods in alcohol research

Emergency room studies & Injuries

Unrecorded alcohol

 

Major topic area: Drinking cultures

Drinking cultures and practices

Drinking attitudes and perceptions

Contexts of risk-taking

Gender and sexuality

 

 

 

     Major topic area: Treatment and interventions

Treatment systems, access and barriers

Treatment users and other special populations

Screening and brief interventions

Web-based intervention

 

     Major topic area: Alcohol and the family

Gender and drinking in pregnancy

Effects of parental drinking

Parenting and industry activities

Family and social influences on drinking

Harm to others: Children

Harm to others: Partners and close contacts

 

     

 

 

Major topic area: Policy and interventions

Directions in alcohol policy

Marketing

Availability

Pricing

Studying the industry

Framing the policy debate

University and school policies

Interventions in the night-time economy

International Alcohol Control Study and Global Health

Harm to others: populations and policy

 

Project meetings and workshops

The weekend before the conference and lunchtimes are traditionally times when groups of collaborators on big international projects can meet face-to-face, and KBS Sheffield was no exception. We also facilitated a number of workshops on topics of mutual interest.

GENACIS (Gender, Alcohol, and Culture: An International Study), GENAHTO (Gender and Alcohol’s Harm to Others), and IGSAHO (International Group for the Study of Alcohol’s Harms to Others) held meetings and workshops to discuss recent cross-national research on alcohol’s harm to others. International leads in the International Alcohol Control Study (IAC) also met to plan their future work and outputs, as did the advisory board for a study on Industry influences in research.

There was two very well-attended lunchtime meetings:  an Early Career Researcher Meeting, and one organized by our major sponsor, the Institute for Alcohol Studies on Walking the advocacy tightrope: What role can researchers play in the alcohol policy process?, and on Local Alcohol Availability & the Night Time Economy.

 

Social programme

The social side is equally important to most of us – on Monday, a conference reception was held in the beautiful winter gardens where the Lord Mayor of Sheffield, who has a professional background in addictions, welcomed delegates and the Dore Male Voice choir provided the evening’s entertainment. On Tuesday, lots of attendees braved the rain to play in the now traditional football match (instructions were limited to: “open to all. Bring a red or white T-shirt and try to get the ball into the right goal”). On Wednesday afternoon, participants were able to choose between several social tours: a trip to Chatsworth House and Gardens, a hill walk in the Peak District and visit to the Castleton caverns, or a shorter outing to Kelham Island Brewery with a pub visit. Thursday evening’s conference dinner was made rather exciting by also being the night of the General Election, with people moving between dance floor and screens till the early hours.

 

Final comments and a thank you

Finally, we would like to thank our sponsors, the Institute for Alcohol Studies, Alcohol Research UK, and the Society for the Study of Addiction. Your support meant that we could offer financial assistance to a large number of scholars from LAMI countries, and we have had many emails thanking us for this help and telling us just how important this conference has been to their career development.

KBS is a great conference for networking, attracting many of the key people in alcohol policy and epidemiology research internationally and, more importantly, folk tend to be generous with their knowledge and very happy to forge new connections and make “newbies” in the field welcome.

See you next year in Chang Mai, Thailand May 28 – June 1, 2018!

 

Professor Petra Meier (on behalf of the organizing team)

Director of the Sheffield Alcohol Research Group

Programme Director Wellcome Trust Doctoral Training Centre in Public Health Economics and Decision Science

ScHARR, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
email: p.meier@sheffield.ac.uk

The opinions expressed in this commentary reflect the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions or official positions of KBS.
 

The opinions expressed in this commentary reflect the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions or official positions of the Society for the Study of Addiction.